I purchased Aperture 1.0 way back when I got my first DSLR and have stuck with it ever since. When Lightroom hit the streets with it's early-bird pricing I jumped on board and grabbed a copy. After all, I've been using Adobe products professionally for over a decade. Due to the lack of updates from Apple and a weak feature set, I have been teetering between Aperture and Lightroom and have had both apps installed on my Macbook Pro 17" (2.16 GHz) for a long time now.
Needless to say, Apple came through in a big way for me with this dot oh upgrade. There are a lot of new features as well as stability and speed improvements that renewed my faith in the application. A lot of the new features bring Aperture back to competition level with Lightroom and some new features, in my opinion, have exceeded Lightrooms capabilities.
New Features
Speed and Stability
First and foremost. My issues are gone with speed and stability in Aperture. Even with photoshop open on my Macbook Pro (along with many other apps) Aperture is snappy. Searches are fast, editing is fast. I am a happy user. The only places I have found speed issues is when using Aperture's tint tools with it's color picker.
RAW 2.0 Decoder
In Aperture 1.x, RAW images had a tendency to have blown hightlights, some of which were difficult to fix. The RAW 2.0 Decoder in Aperture 2.0 is a huge improvement leaving less work for the photographer. A feature Lightroom had and Aperture now has too is the "highlight hot and cold" feature. In 1.x, Aperture would only overlay the blown highlights. Now it will overlay blue where your shadows are underexposed. Chalk that up to a match between the two apps.
Definition Slider
One tool I always wished Aperture had that I envied from the Lightroom toolset was the definition tool. It's a quick way to get the details in the image without adding edge sharpening or jumping to photoshop. Thank you Apple for including this!
Vibrancy
The vibrancy tool is a punch-my-colors-up-quick tool. It does what you thought the saturation tool should do without creating more work for you. Tip: I've always heard people complain that the vibrancy tool in Lightroom made everything look blue; back off your saturation if this happens.
Black Point and Recovery
I'm not going to go into these two tools and what they do. I think most people already know, especially Lightroom users. However, the engineers put an easter egg in Aperture. If you hold down your command key while making adjustments you get a overlay showing you what regions of the image will be effected. This also works on the exposure tool.
All Projects and Mouse Gestures
For a quick visual scan of your projects, Aperture 2.0 has a new feature in the projects panel call "All Projects" which provides you with a thumbnail of each project starting with the first image. Now where it gets cool is when you mouse over any of the thumbnails and move your mouse left or right, the images scroll through the thumbnail's region giving you a mouse gestured window into that project. And it's extremely fast! Kudos to the Apple engineers for this feature.
Tethered Shooting
This is the straw that broke the camels back for me. I've been searching for a way to tether my D80. In some cases it would be nice to have a larger image instead of having to look at the tiny 2.5" LCD on the camera. I've purchase several portable DVD players and returned them because the quality just wasn't there. Third-party software seemed to be the solution and it's not cheap. Now Aperture users can tether their camera and use their laptop as a chimping machine. I can attest that this works with the Nikon D80 and have friends who have used it with their Canon 5D. I can't say that all cameras will work but give it a try with the trail version of Aperture 2.0 and see.
Update: I'm compiling a list of supported cameras. If you have confirmation that your camera does or does not work with this feature, add your camera in the comments and I'll update the list.
Quick Preview and Faster Searches
Quick preview makes Aperture blazing fast when moving through hundreds or thousands of images. When activated, the button becomes yellow alerting you that you cannot make edits but it allows you to navigate without having to wait for RAW images to update. Searching your image library is much faster in Aperture 2.0 compared to 1.x. On my machine, these two features have moved Aperture above Lightroom in the speed category.
New HUD Layout and Tabs
In Aperture 1.x, by default, the adjustment tools were separated from your projects and if you had both toolsets activated you lost valuable real estate. When in full screen mode, your projects were not available to you. You had to continually switch between the to screen modes to navigate between projects. In Aperture 2.0 he Aperture engineers have rearranged the layout a little bit giving you more real estate and allowing you to work continuously in full screen mode. The hot key 'w' allows me to jump between my tabs to activate the projects, metadata or adjustment tools.
One big gripe I always had with Lightroom is having to switch between modes. Again, in my opinion, Aperture excels in this category. The interface is so much more user friendly. Not to mention that Aperture's full screen mode is just sexy.
Retouch Tools
Aperture always had a spot and patch tool. Aperture has introduced a Repair and Clone tool in version two. Much like photoshops clone and stamp, the clone tool in Aperture 2.0 allows you to (option-click) a region in your photo as the sample source for cloning. Both the repair and clone tools will paint a white mask on the image while making adjustments so you know exactly what areas will be affected. For most situations these two features will keep the photographer in Aperture without having to use Photoshop. In extreme cases Photoshop will still be required.
Vignetting and De-vignetting
Vignetting is now possible within Aperture. This is another feature I was hoping for and Apple came through. It's been in Lightroom forever but Aperture users had to jump to Photoshop to add this effect to photographs. Apple engineers took this one step further and gives the option to have vignetting affect the gamma or exposure in your images. Use the de-vingetting tool to remove the effect from images.
Lens Meta Data
In the 1.x version of Aperture the lens data was not present and accounted for. This is now added in Version 2.0.
Miscellaneous
With over a 100 new features in Aperture I've only touched on a few. These were the ones that I really wanted and the ones that stand out at the time of this writing.
Aperture engineers have snuck in a plugin api which will allow third party developers to create some enhanced tools for Aperture. This will be exciting to see what happens!
Why I didn't migrate to Lightroom
Speed and tethering were the two main reasons I decided to cough up the ninety-nine dollars to upgrade Aperture above the great new tools included in this version.Why did I decide to stick with Aperture instead of move to Lightroom is a question I've been asked dozens of times this week. I've always had a issue with file management in Lightroom. It's probably due to the fact that I was accustomed to the way Aperture handles files or maybe it's because I think Adobe did it wrong. Either way, I prefer Apertures file management. In addition I never could get used to the interface in Lightroom. Having to switch between modes was cumbersome for me; something I don't have to do in Aperture. That being said, I did like a lot of the tools in Lightroom which had me seriously thinking about making a switch. Namely, the clarity tool (definition in Aperture 2.0), vibrancy and recovery tools and the vignetting tool. Aperture now has all of these features and leaves me wanting nothing in comparison to Lightroom.
One tool I can't live without is Fraser Speirs Flickr export plugin for Aperture and since I've been working with the version 3 beta, and know what he has in store I can't imagine having to jump through hoops in Lightroom to get my images into my Flickr stream.
In consclusion, if you're thinking about which app fits your needs, it's not my place to say. Download both trials and seriously compare your experiences. Make sure you use the trials to process some really tough images so you can see which one is going to perform your tasks the best.
I will be upgrading the Aperture Cheat Sheets later next week for those using Aperture 2.0. Subscribe to the feed so you're notified when they are posted for download.
On Saturday, Feb 16
Greg,
I hope Apple give you a commission, you helped sell another copy I think....
On Saturday, Feb 16
Now wouldn't that be something Jack! I think you'll be very pleased with it. Make sure you use the trial version first, which can be upgraded to full with the entry of your key after purchase.
On Saturday, Feb 16
Greg: great that you made a decision and it sounds like you're comfortable with it. That's what counts.
Of course, these two products, Aperture and Lightroom are not neck and neck in development: Aperture has been out a lot longer and Lightroom is still in version 1.x. No doubt Adobe has a copy of Aperture, etc.
I've decided to stick with my switch to LR because I'm much more comfortable with it on my computer, which is similar to yours.
So, we're both happy and that's what counts.
On Saturday, Feb 16
One tool I would like to see in Aperture is a perspective correction tool for the tall buildings situation where you MUST tilt the camera. I know there are ways to do that, but I resist using multiple tools as I want to keep reduced size files, all in one place.
On Sunday, Feb 17
i may be blind but where is a image flip(vertical/horizontal)/mirror tool?
On Sunday, Feb 17
@Bela Feher
I would like to see that too. I use the Sigma 10-20mm a lot and in some instances I'd like to be able to correct that without jumping to photoshop. DXO would fix it too but that's just another package I don't need.
@missing
Hmm.. Not seeing an option for that either. Did you check the manual?
On Sunday, Feb 17
Thanks for writing the review, Greg. I'm with Jack; Apple should give you an Aperture license. :-)
I don't know whether you were aware of this, but since you didn't mention it, the "All Projects" view in Aperture 2.0 is identical to the "All Events" view in iPhoto '08.
I'm happy with the speed of some things in Aperture 2.0 that were slow for me in Aperture 1.5, such as straightening, but I'm still frustrated with slow response on image adjustments even though I have a 2 GHz Intel iMac with 2 GB RAM. I don't even run any other apps when I have Aperture open, and I still suffer from "slider lag" (if you can call it that). But overall, I'm happy with the improvements and have made the switch.
On Sunday, Feb 17
File management is an issue I have with Adobe products in general. They don't feel like Mac applications. They present convoluted, unintuitive, and unintegrated interfaces that don't feel familiar (i.e. they're nothing like anything you find on a Mac, most especially like the Finder's interface).
I think it's the fact that Adobe designs Windows applications and Mac is an after-thought (which is ironic, since Adobe cut their GUI development teeth on the Mac platform only to abandon it for the more lucrative Windows market back in the '90s).
Aperture has had it growing pains, but being that it's an Apple product, I trust it will get the best consideration from Apple for well thought out, best-of-breed, integration with the Mac interface. Apple should write more pro applications.
On Sunday, Feb 17
Greg,
Great review of Apeture 2.0...it is something worth considering if I ever decide to the Mac world of computers. It is not going to be an easy decision deciding b/w Mac and PC but hopefully,
I am anxious to see what Lightroom comes up with and maybe the playing field will be leveled when Version 2.0 comes out...I am sure they are reviewing the new Features of A2.0 and hopefully, some features will be in Lightroom especially more speed.
Chris
On Sunday, Feb 17
@Daniel
I didn't opt for the upgrade to iLife 08 yet. Thanks for that though.
In Aperture 1.x, if you turned off previews for new project in the preferences, which basically shares them with iWork, etc. then you got a speed boost. I've continued on with that in A2 so you might want to give it a try and see if it helps you.
@HG
I think you've hit the nail on the head. Take CS3 for example. I still don't think it's up to par with Leopard.
@Chris
I'm sure your right about LR. I think it's going to be an ongoing tug of war between the two. However, take a read of the post above yours. I think HG has a good point for those of us on a mac.
On Monday, Feb 18
Stumbled upon this site from the Aperture user group on flickr. I have to compliment you on a great review. Good job! My copy of Aperture 2.0 has yet to arrive. I can't wait!
On Monday, Feb 18
Thanks Art. I hope it makes your image management shine.
On Monday, Feb 18
Thanks for the tip, Greg. I tried it, though, and I still have slider lag. I'd like to be able to grab one of those slider controls and have it zigzag along with my mouse as I go zoom-zoom-zoom back and forth. Is that too much to ask? As it is, it takes a long time to adjust my images because I have to slowly drag my mouse a millimeter at a time for each and every adjustment I want to make, and I have to wait for the slider to catch up with me after every infinitesimal adjustment. The sliders don't act like anything I can actually "grab." They're like ghosts (in a movie)-- you go to grab them and you're unable to gain purchase on anything but thin air. A couple of seconds after I move my mouse -- which seems like an eternity -- the controls finally catch up to where my mouse is.
Granted, I turned off previews for new projects but I'm still trying to edit images in a project that Aperture already created previews for. I wonder if I have to wait until I'm working on images in a newly created project to see the speed boost.
On Monday, Feb 18
Daniel
Can you tell me your machine specs? If you have a 5400rpm drive, i'm going to point my finger at that. I'm using a MBP 17" with 2 gigs ram and don't use the internal drive. Instead I use a external firewire 7200rpm. When I bought that for just over a hundred bucks, I saw a massive improvement in performance. Richard has a tutorial on how to replace one if you are using a macbook pro. That route will cost a little more than using an external but he can vouch for the performance improvements too.
On Monday, Feb 18
I have a 20" Intel iMac with a 2 GHz processor and 2 GB of RAM. I tried using System Profiler just now to see the speed of the hard drive, but I didn't see this information. When I look under Hardware, Serial-ATA, it shows the model of the hard drive: Maxtor 6L250M0. I am using Aperture on the internal hard drive and using Time Machine to keep my system backed up to a 250 GB FireWire hard drive (though I'm considering getting a Time Capsule).
Also, as far as Previews go, I'm still learning about how to use Aperture per se, not just Aperture 2.0, so I just did some searching and learned more about how Previews work. I right-clicked on my Library and selected Delete Previews for Library. I do want to use my images from Aperture in iLife and iWork (integration is one of the main selling points of Aperture, isn't it?), so I set my Preview preferences to be Medium quality (8) and Limit size to 1280x1280. I unchecked "New projects automatically generate previews" so that I don't have to deal with that overhead when I'm working on images in a new project; I can just wait until I'm done editing them and then I can select them and click "Update previews."
Hmm... you know what? I think I do see a speed boost. The slider handles still don't seem willing to "zoom" with me (speaking of speed, not magnification), but they do come along if I am relatively patient. This is less frustrating. :-)
On Monday, Feb 18
Without looking it up, I'm thinking that's NOT the chrome (new) iMac right. In which case, I "think" they use the 5400rpm drive. All new iMacs use 7200rpms now. Good to hear you're making progress Daniel!
Personally, I don't use the integration. The only thing I do use is integration with my iPhone which doesn't utilize the previews.
On Friday, Feb 22
Great review, Greg.
Question for you: I have used Aperture since I decided to use the deeply frustrating combination of Capture NX and View NX. I ditched Aperture 1.x because I found it slow. I've been using LR for bulk processing when I've got hundreds of shots because NX is so fiddly. I've always wanted to use Aperture because it has comfortable feel to it and the trial of 2.0 does good things renderingwise for my D300 nefs. The only reason why AP2 hasn't got my vote is that it still seems very slow (not in comparison to NX, which is glacial, but in comparison to LR). When I move the sliders in AP2 there is lots of lag and I am getting much more beachballing than I'd like. No such delay in LR. My Mac, meanwhile is no slouch: Mac Pro Dual Core 2.66 with no less than 9GB RAM. Do you have any thoughts as to why I would be seeing a sluggish performance when you've been impressed by the speed of AP2?
Cheers
D
On Friday, Feb 22
Thanks David.
A number of things can cause this. First thing I always do is turn off "generate previews for new projects". That diminishes performance and if you don't share your previews with iWork and other apps then I find it useless. 9 Gigs of ram surely is not the problem, hah. I wish I had that much. I'm assuming your writing to a 7200rpm drive and not a 5400rpm. The later will cause drag. Are you seeing this problem with imports from the camera or images imported from old libraries? Images in the 1.x RAW format are slower than those in the 2.0, at least in my experience. I'm running on a Macbook Pro 2.16 with 2 gigs of ram and rarely see a lag.
On Friday, Feb 22
Hi Greg
Tuned off 'generate previews for new projects' seemed to speed things up at first but things slowed right down again pretty soon.
Yes drives are all 7200s.
Problem is with imports from my D300 but same on older files from D200.
AP is at it's most frustratingly laggy in edge sharpening. Sliders take a second or so (which is a long time on a meaty Mac Pro) to catch up often beachballing. Like I said LR doesn't do this. As I said I'd really like to be able to use AP2 as my DAM and raw coverter for everything but the sluggishness I am seeing is v frustrating. I've done a lot of reading/googling on this and the satisfied customers seem to outnumber those who think it's slow. So that's why I though it might be something to do with my settings or set up. Everything else is super quick. I might try reinstalling the thing before I give up. I am happy it's good for you all the same.
Cheers
David
On Sunday, Feb 24
Greg
Thanks for an excellent comparison, i was looking for for some time this eek, sort of to reconfirm my experience and preference of A2 over LR 1.3.1. Beyond the great new features you already mention above, there are 2 discoveries i made, which were my straw, having liked and being used to the LR interface and these are :
1. A (much) better raw processing (noise, color > detail, etc) of my Lumix LX2 files in A2 !! This one was an eye opener .. A2 does not touch noise, or may be just refines the noise, and this makes the whole difference, LR is very agresive with noise, leaving color blotches in place of detail
2. Coming off 1, the B&W conversion in A2 using luminocity, is better then results from LR using the same approach. It is way better particularly in high contrast areas, where ou cannot avoid halos and artifacts in LR, at least i failed.
Finally i saved myself few 100 $, from purchasing a film grain solution - i can now produce better results than DXO Film Pack for ex, producing 2-3 film grains : Ilford XP2, HP5+ / Tri-X.
On Sunday, Feb 24
Forgot to mention the shortcomings which are really spoiling the party :
1. No CA corrections !
2. No Lense barrel correction
3. When in Full screen, cannot switch to another application, cannot us Spaces
These 3 above would have made A2, the single place for all
On Monday, Feb 25
Your welcome Ilko.
i've noticed the black and white conversions as well. It's very strong in A2. The Raw processing is fabulous though. I have opened some old images that were tough to process and the new decoder has brought new life to them.
The lens correction tools would have been nice, however, with the rumor of a API to be released for image processing I would not doubt that there will be some great tools in the future for A2 users.
On Monday, Feb 25
Agreed about RAW and B&W ! I'm actually quite pissed off i did not keep all the raw over the years. I have resorted to PTLens for barrel and CA corrections, the jump to XP can be a pain at times .. Tried out Helicon Filter and liked it a lot, however couldn't get batch to work at all.. LensFix destroys detail when correcting barrel, a known issue something to do with core image in OS X
On Saturday, Mar 1
I had moved Aperture 1.5 to my external hard drive, and was ready to dump it altogether if version 2.0 didn't make it competitive with Lightroom. Fortunately, I won't have to struggle with the file management of LR any longer because Aperture 2.0 meets my needs. Remaining on my wish list is a DXO/ Aperture round trip plug in. I also would have appreciated a price discount for the 2.0 upgrade, just as new users of Aperture are enjoying a significant price reduction.
On Thursday, Mar 6
Hey Greg,
Stumbled across this website while researching the diff / benefits between light room and aperture. I was pretty much sold on aperture anyway before reading your excellent post, as I figured that being an apple product it will integrate with the rest of the mac software well.
I am about to go out and purchase the new 2.5GHz 15" Macbook Pro with 512MB graphics, multi track touchpad and 250GB hardrive. Now the 250GB hard drive is 5400rpm as opposed to the 200GB 7200rpm hard drive available for approx. $70 AU extra.
I have noticed a lot of discussion about hard drive speeds in relation to apertures speed and performance. I am not what you would call a hardcore photographer, photography is at best a second income. Is it really worth paying more for a hard drive with less storage capacity just for some ectra rpm's.
Also does aperture allow batch watermarking of images at the export stage, if for example you wanted to send out some low res water marked images on disk as a sample of your work or as proff images for confirmation.
Pav.
On Thursday, Mar 6
Hello Pav. I'm glad the article was helpful.
To answer your questions. First, the water marking. Yes, Aperture will watermark your images on export. You can create a watermark graphic and use that as the watermark, telling aperture where you want to put it, ie. lower left, lower right, center, etc. and save that as an export preset. It works great.
Now for the hard drive. It's subjective at best. I know some guys who don't mind the 5400 speed. I personally prefer the 7200 speed. It does make a difference. Anytime your writing/reading large files, whether you are using aperture or not, you will see a performance increase with a faster drive. Drives are cheap these days. You can always pick up a external 7200rpm drive for a hundred bucks or so if you find the 5400 doesn't suit your needs. Whether you shoot for pleasure or income, you can quickly exceed a 250 gig drive anyway, especially when shooting raw. If it were me, I'd probably opt for the 5400 internal and put some extra money into a faster external setup.
If you have an apple store close to you, ask them if you can try out aperture on both speeds and see what the difference is. You might find you like the 7200 better.
Hope this helps
On Friday, Mar 7
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the advice, am well pleased about the watermarking, that will save a lot of time. And you are probably right about the hard drives. The more storage you can get onboard for your money the better, and if you need more speed better to pick up a terabite drive or something with quick rpm to run external.
Also I am one of the few faithful still running a minolta rig. I have both the Dynax 5D and 7D digital SLR models. Was wondering whether anyone knows if these camera's work with the tethered function.
Cheers,
Pav.
On Wednesday, Mar 26
Regarding hard drives speed - my 2 c -what i found in the recent months :
1. The most important facter re performance seems to be the type of drive with sata and e-sata (sata 2) being the fastest on the market now - this is more important than the rotational speed, i am not going to delve in much detail here though
2. The connection to the motherboard - best is over firewire ! USB2 seesm to be much slower, tested n my macbook. For example a non-sata , bus powered firewire drive (LaCie) outperformed mostly on write in various tests a usb sata drive (Fujitsu-Siemens) !
3. Format of the drive .. NTFS seem to be outperforming FAT32. however you cannot use it on a mac - mac cannot write to ntfs
Regards
Ilko
On Friday, Mar 28
Greg,
Your article and the resulting posts have answered most of my questions. However, one issue that was raised in another review of LR, concerned migration and multiple databases/libraries. It basically said that A2 could only perform it's search and sorting over a single database or library at a time, while LR was able to work across multiple sources (i.e., one library on the main computer and another on an external drive). Since I'm not a photographer by profession, my hardware setup is apt to change over time. Your thoughts?
Thanks,
Joe
On Tuesday, Apr 1
Sorry for the delay Joe.
I believe Bagelturf.com just recently did an article on this issue. I'm sorry I don't have the direct url but it should be close to the front page.
On Tuesday, Apr 15
[url=http://www.mysportsforum.com/forums/t6878-overnight-tramadol.html]Overnight tramadol[/url]
[url=http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=38083]Phentermine overnight delivery[/url]
[url=http://support.travispeak.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47]Soma no prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.care2.com/c2c/people/profile.html?pid=356994859]Buy ambien[/url]
[url=http://www.zindamagazine.com/ziggurat/showthread.php?t=16703]Xanax overnight delivery cheap[/url]
[url=http://www.mysportsforum.com/forums/t6877-buy-phentermine-online.html]Buy phentermine online[/url]
[url=http://www.anyboard.net/suggest/posts/566116.html]Cialis Overnight Delivery[/url]
[url=http://www.zindamagazine.com/ziggurat/showthread.php?t=16687]Viagra Saturday delivery[/url]
[url=http://www.care2.com/c2c/people/profile.html?pid=259439699]Buy soma[/url]
[url=http://streetball.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=29633]Ultram without prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.mixx.com/users/Buy_tramadol_cod]Buy Tramadol[/url]
[url=http://vegweb.com/index.php?action=profile;u=87341]Tramadol[/url]
[url=http://support.travispeak.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45]Tramadol next day[/url]
[url=http://www.mysportsforum.com/forums/t6889-ultram-free-shipping.html]Ultram free shipping[/url]
[url=http://streetball.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=29624]Soma without prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.zindamagazine.com/ziggurat/showthread.php?t=16679]Phentermine online overnight delivery[/url]
[url=http://support.travispeak.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55]Buy valium without prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.anyboard.net/suggest/posts/566109.html]Cialis No Prior Prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=38089]Order soma cod[/url]
[url=http://streetball.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=29627]Cheap viagra no prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=38093]Viagra no prescription overnight[/url]
On Tuesday, Apr 15
[url=http://www.anyboard.net/suggest/posts/566178.html]Buy Cheap Fedex Cialis[/url]
[url=http://us.cyworld.com/Phentermine-truth]Phentermine[/url]
[url=http://www.zindamagazine.com/ziggurat/showthread.php?t=16687]Order ultram cod[/url]
[url=http://www.mysportsforum.com/forums/t6883-viagra-no-prescription.html]Viagra no prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=38083]Buy tramadol cod[/url]
[url=http://www.mysportsforum.com/forums/t6888-ambien-no-prescription.html]Ambien no prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.anyboard.net/suggest/posts/566177.html]Cialis Overnight No Prescription[/url]
[url=http://streetball.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=29621]Tramadol without prescription[/url]
[url=http://vegweb.com/index.php?action=profile;u=87342]Phentermine[/url]
[url=http://www.zindamagazine.com/ziggurat/showthread.php?t=16680]Phentermine without prescription overnight[/url]
[url=http://www.care2.com/c2c/people/profile.html?pid=501803299]Buy viagra[/url]
[url=http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=38127]Valium overnight delivery[/url]
[url=http://streetball.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=29639]Overnight xanax[/url]
[url=http://support.travispeak.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46]Tramadol no prescription[/url]
[url=http://support.travispeak.com/forums/showthread.php?t=58]Xanax without prescription[/url]
[url=http://www.couchsurfing.com/people/wedryklop]Buy Xanax[/url]
[url=http://streetball.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=29638]Valium online overnight[/url]
[url=http://www.zindamagazine.com/ziggurat/showthread.php?t=16682]Order tramadol cod[/url]
[url=http://www.mysportsforum.com/forums/t6892-valium-free-shipping.html]Valium free shipping[/url]
[url=http://support.travispeak.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56]Order valium cod[/url]
[url=http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=38126]Valium shipped cod[/url]